|

|
July 29, 2008 Candidates’ economic teams read like a “who’s who"Posted: 07:35 AM ET
News Correspondent Richard Lui Your credit limit has been increased to $10.6 trillion.
At left, McCain's advisor Carly Fiorina, former CEO of Hewlett-Packard. At right, Obama's advisor Warren Buffett, CEO of Berskshire Hathaway. That’s what Congress is saying to the U.S. government. All the House bill needs is the expected John Hancock of President Bush. Add to that the recent estimate that 2009's budget deficit will be $482 billion, and the numbers the next president will have to deal with clearly are huge. So how much is 10.6 trillion or 10,600,000,000,000? It's 10 to the 13th power, or ten thousand, thousand, thousand, thousand. As NPR describes it, it makes the Milky Way–with 100 to 400 billion stars–look like a sandbox. It's enough to buy 10,000 boxes of Girl Scout cookies for every person in the U.S. No worries on picking between Thin Mints and Samoas here. To help them with the numbers, the candidates have built up their back bench. The teams helping McCain and Obama craft their economic polices looks like a who’s who in business. McCain has Carly Fiorina, former CEO of Hewlett-Packard; Fred W. Smith, founder and CEO, FedEx; Meg Whitman, former CEO of eBay; and others. Obama’s power list is no weaker. Among them are Warren Buffett, CEO, Berkshire Hathaway; Paul Volcker, former Fed Chairman; and Jeffrey Liebman, Public Policy professor, Harvard. Here’s part of what they came up with for their candidates: McCain’s plan: Obama’s plan: Those are the highlights of their deficit-fighting plans… but by one count, it doesn’t look like Senators John McCain or Barack Obama will help the cause much. The Tax Policy Center’s analysis finds when comparing their plans to current law, which ends tax cuts by 2011, the deficit balloons more. In this scenario over 10 years, McCain would increase the long-term deficit by $5 trillion, and Obama by $3.4 trillion (more Thin Mints for everyone). In a second, and more likely, scenario—if the current tax cuts stay unchanged past 2010–then the differences look better. In this second scenario, the Tax Policy Center estimates McCain’s plan would increase the deficit by $600 billion, and Obama’s would instead raise revenue by $800 billion. There are some caveats. These numbers don't count health care plans, which could cost $1.3 to $1.6 trillion. The estimates also don't count costs for Social Security and Medicare. So, all that said, who do you think will do better in tackling the budget? What do you think of the specific elements of each of their deficit-fighting measures? And what about their economic strike teams—are they the right folks to lower prices, and shore up the mortgage problems? Who do you trust more? Let us know what you think, and we’ll be sharing your thoughts on Morning Express! Posted by: News Correspondent Richard Lui |
It's Morning Express like you've never seen it before! Hear from Robin Meade and the rest of the show crew for our thoughts on everything from politics to sports... to those bizarre stories that have us buzzing behind the scenes. Plus, plenty of material you might not see on the air. Don't miss OUR TAKE on what's happening in the world. Then tell us YOURS! Recent Posts
Contributors
Robin Meade
Delivering your dose of morning news, to get you out of bed and off to work. Richard Lui
Digging deeper into politics, and the stories behind the presidential race. Bob Van Dillen
From tracking storms to airport delays, Bob is your weather and travel expert. Jennifer Westhoven
Jennifer has the tips you need to take action on stories affecting your wallet. Rafer Weigel
Rafer gives you his take on wild sports highlights and inspirational athletes. Categories
|
Loading weather data ...